Contrary to previous claims by Greenpeace, the Dakota Access Pipeline (DAPL) does not cross any Native American lands, nor does the pipeline traverse any Standing Rock Sioux Tribe property at…
Along with the misinformation that Greenpeace systemically distributed to the media, general public and their followers, Greenpeace also engaged in a targeted campaign with Energy Transfer’s business constituents, seeking to…
Greenpeace repeatedly claims, through social media, emails and traditional media campaigns, that Energy Transfer’s lawsuit is an attack on free speech and intended to silence the organization. On July 23,…
Greenpeace falsely claimed that Energy Transfer disturbed sacred and culturally important sites, which is false. The Dakota Access Pipeline’s route was carefully planned to avoid historically and culturally significant sites,…
Greenpeace repeatedly published false statements that Energy Transfer and Dakota Access used “extreme violence” against “peaceful protestors.” The state of North Dakota publicly concluded that law enforcement on site used…
In response to the misinformation campaign that Greenpeace distributed and amplified, thousands of protestors traveled to North Dakota. Greenpeace USA taught and trained protestors methods to attach themselves to construction…
End of content
End of content